Multi Region Design Patterns and Best Practices Arc306

Title

AWS re:Invent 2022 - Multi-Region design patterns and best practices (ARC306)

Summary

  • John Fermento introduced the session, emphasizing the importance of understanding multi-region requirements and not all applications need multi-region architecture.

  • Multi-region fundamentals were discussed, including:

    • Understanding requirements through business and IT alignment via tiering strategies.
    • Understanding data, particularly the implications of asynchronous vs. synchronous replication.
    • Understanding dependencies, ensuring services are available in the target region, and considering third-party dependencies.
    • Failover mechanisms should be independent of the primary region.
    • Operational readiness, including service quotas, IAM permissions, and service control policies.
    • Deployment strategies should avoid simultaneous deployments across regions.
    • Monitoring and observability are crucial, especially for replication lag and health of the application in the primary region.
    • People and process, including regular testing of the DR strategy and defining the scope of failover.
    • Cost and complexity considerations, as multi-region can be expensive and complex.
  • Barry Sheward from Vanguard Group shared their global multi-region strategy, focusing on:

    • Improving user experience by moving compute and data closer to users.
    • High availability without significant user impact during failures.
    • Data patterns like hub and spoke, and follow the sun.
    • Dependencies on third-party data providers and how they handle them using AWS services.
    • Operational readiness through continuous testing and anomaly detection.
  • Neeraj Kumar discussed broader multi-region patterns, including:

    • Active-passive for regional failover and regulatory needs.
    • Active-active for high availability and performance needs.
    • Regional sharding for data locality and performance.
    • Single writer and multiple readers for eventual consistency.
    • Strong consistency across regions for zero RPO requirements.
    • Dual writes for data atomicity and idempotency.
    • Multi-writers, multi-readers for distributed read and write traffic.
    • Routing strategies using DNS, Lambda at Edge, and Global Accelerator.
    • Key takeaways: start with single-region resilience, consider business value, avoid inter-region dependencies, and choose the right pattern for your workload.

Insights

  • Multi-region architecture is not a one-size-fits-all solution and should be considered based on specific business needs and application requirements.
  • Asynchronous replication is preferred for performance but comes with the risk of data not being immediately available in the standby region, while synchronous replication ensures data consistency but introduces latency.
  • Dependencies on third-party services can be a significant risk factor in multi-region architectures, and strategies should be in place to mitigate this risk, such as using multiple providers or ensuring they can operate independently.
  • Operational readiness is critical, and regular testing of disaster recovery strategies is essential to ensure they will work when needed.
  • Cost and complexity are significant factors in multi-region deployments, and the benefits must be weighed against these considerations.
  • Routing strategies can be complex in active-active scenarios, and services like AWS Lambda at Edge and Global Accelerator can provide advanced routing capabilities.
  • Resilience can often be improved within a single region before considering multi-region, which should be a strategic decision rather than a default approach.